The MAC 35A Pistol

Very often, one only finds very general photos of a firearm (right and left sides). This is a shame, as it hides many technical details. I believe we need to uncover the hidden details in every little nook and cranny to better understand the manufacturing methods and corporate culture behind the design. I hope the photos below will help you explore specific technical points you may be looking for, or simply be enjoyable to look at.

I would like to share the images below with the community of French service firearms enthusiasts.

The MAC 35A Pistol

General View

The Frame

The Slide

The Barrel

The Recoil Spring Guide Rod

The guide rod consists of several parts. The recoil spring cannot be disassembled without tools. All parts are made of steel.

The Fire Control Unit (Lockwork)

The fire control group is easy to disassemble. All parts are solid and made of steel. 

 

The fire control group houses the ejector.

Conclusion

The PA MAC 35A pistol is a slim, lightweight, and elegant firearm. It features a simple design and is well-crafted.

The specimen examined here is not in very good cosmetic condition; the bluing is gone, and a slight orange-peel texture covers the exterior surfaces. Nevertheless, it allowed us to study its design and manufacturing.

The magazine was not included with the firearm.

Posted in Handguns, Military french guns | Leave a comment

The Successor to the SIG PRO 2022 Pistol

This article is the logical continuation of the article titled: The Master Plan of Technical Advances in the French Service Pistol.

Knowing that you must understand where you come from to know where you are going, we will start by examining the firearm to be replaced and seeing where it stands relative to its predecessors. Next, we will attempt to look ahead and list the features that the next French service pistol could possess. Finally, we will discuss the replacement protocol.

The SIG PRO 2022 Pistol

With the adoption of the SIG PRO 2022 pistol, the master plan of technical advances in the French service pistol took a small leap forward. Here are its strengths :

    • A sturdy carrying case bearing the firearm’s serial number ;
    • An electronic microchip embedded in the frame ;
    • A Picatinny accessory rail ;
    • An empty chamber flag (chamber safety indicator) ;
    • A polymer frame ;
    • A removable fire control unit (with the aid of tools) ;
    • A squared trigger guard ;
    • A hammer decocking lever ;
    • A firing pin block safety ;
    • A heavy-duty extractor ;
    • A one-piece barrel ;
    • A removable grip module providing access to the mechanism ;
    • Removable front and rear sights ;
    • A reversible/ambidextrous magazine release ;
    • An anti-corrosion finish on the slide.

Operating Principles of Its Successor

There is little chance that we will reinvent the wheel when replacing the SIG PRO 2022 pistol.

Based on this premise and the previous article, what types of mechanisms might equip the next French service pistol? In my view, two types of firing mechanisms and two types of locking systems are likely. What are they?

Firing mechanisms :

    • Hammer-fired (exposed or internal) in single and/or double action (e.g., MAS G1/G1S, SIG PRO 2022, and others) ;
    • Striker-fired / “axial” percussion (e.g., Manufrance Le Français, Glock, and others).

Locking systems :

    • Fixed barrel and gas-delayed blowback (e.g., HK P7 type) ;
    • Linkless Colt-Browning tilting-barrel locking system (e.g., SIG PRO 2022).

This gives us 4 possible combinations :

    • Hammer-fired and fixed barrel (e.g., Steyr GB 80) ;

    • Hammer-fired and linkless Colt-Browning cam-locking system (e.g., CZ 75) ;

    • Striker-fired and fixed barrel (e.g., HK P7) ;

    • Striker-fired and linkless Colt-Browning cam-locking system (e.g., Glock).

Specifications for Its Successor

It will now be difficult to erase certain developments and operational habits from collective memory. It is hard to imagine taking a step backward by adopting a service pistol with an 8-round capacity, no firing pin safety, and a single-action-only trigger. Ideally, what specifications should we demand and expect from the new handgun?

Key assets of a service pistol :

    • A simple and rugged firearm ;
    • Chambered in 9 mm or larger ;
    • A minimal number of parts ;
    • A minimal number of springs ;
    • Safe carry with a round chambered ;
    • Compact footprint (suitable for both uniformed patrol and plainclothes/investigative units) ;
    • Use of durable, high-resistance materials ;
    • A low bore axis ;
    • Easy user field-stripping ;
    • Ability for the user to clean the fire control unit ;
    • High-capacity magazines ;
    • …

The slide :

    • Removable steel sights ;
    • Sights available in various sizes, but non-adjustable ;
    • No manual safety lever ;
    • A firing pin safety ;
    • Proper heat treatment in the locking area (if a locking system is used) ;
    • Deep slide serrations (for pulling the slide back) ;
    • Both rear and front slide serrations ;
    • An effective anti-corrosion coating ;
    • A chamfered/truncated lower rear slide profile (to protect the guide rails) ;
    • A heavy-duty extractor that doubles as a loaded chamber indicator ;
    • A push-button extractor plunger/pin (no roll pin) ;
    • A firing pin or striker assembly not retained by a roll pin ;
    • A gas relief vent hole to reduce recoil ;
    • Easy disassembly of the firing pin/striker and extractor (with minimal tools) ;
    • …

The frame:

    • A polymer frame, dyed throughout, resistant to solvents ;
    • Long, machined slide guide rails ;
    • A modular grip available in various sizes ;
    • A squared trigger guard ;
    • A Picatinny or similar rail under the frame ;
    • A generously sized, ambidextrous steel magazine release ;
    • A removable grip easily taken off by the operator ;
    • A sturdy attachment point for a lanyard ;
    • A magazine capacity of 17 or 18 rounds (either to increase ammunition loadout per officer or to reduce spring fatigue with a 15-round loadout) ;
    • No pins installed using a press or retained with O-rings (unlike the SIG PRO 2022) ;
    • Houses a steel chassis/insert supporting the firing or trigger mechanism ;
    • A metal cradle/locking block for the barrel ;
    • An embedded tracking microchip ;
    • …

The barrel :

    • Must be a one-piece construction ;
    • Its length determines the compactness of the firearm ;
    • An integral feed ramp machined into the barrel ;
    • Either a linkless Colt-Browning tilting-barrel locking system using angled locking lugs/cam (like Glock, SIG PRO 2022, CZ 75) ;
    • Or a fixed barrel secured to the polymer frame via a metal cradle that also incorporates the guide rails ;
    • Gas relief vent ports to reduce recoil ;
    • …

The firing mechanism :

Hammer-fired :

    • A hammer-fired mechanism (such as the MAS G1/G1S, SIG PRO 2022, and derivatives) housed in a removable fire control pack easily disassembled by the operator and supported by the polymer frame ;
    • This fire control chassis is retained in the polymer frame by a pin ;
    • No sear notch wear, requiring a hammer and sear made of properly hardened steel ;
    • Pins that stay securely in place without the grip panel installed ;
    • A relatively heavy trigger pull to prevent negligent discharges ;
    • A fire control pack accessible to the operator ;
    • …

Striker-fired (“axial” percussion) :

    • A firing mechanism housed inside the slide (such as Glock and derivatives) ;
    • Pins that stay securely in place ;
    • A relatively heavy trigger pull to prevent negligent discharges ;
    • A firearm allowing immediate firing without manually cocking the striker ;
    • A fire control pack accessible to the operator ;
    • …

The trigger mechanism :

    • A trigger and a trigger bar/disconnector ;
    • A wide trigger shoe ;
    • A crisp, positive trigger return spring ;
    • An integrated trigger safety lever (optional) ;
    • A short reach from the backstrap to the trigger (for smaller hands) ;
    • …

Accessories :

    • A storage loader/spacer ;
    • A sturdy empty chamber indicator flag ;
    • A rugged carrying case (hinges and latches) with a combination lock ;
    • A one-piece cleaning rod threaded for brushes and a patch jag ;
    • Bronze/brass, nylon, and felt bore brushes/mops ;
    • A magazine speed loader ;
    • 2 or 3 magazines, or higher-capacity magazines ;
    • Magazines protected against corrosion and harsh conditions, easy to maintain (polymer body or polymer-coated) ;
    • An optical sight mounted on top of the firearm for specialized units ;
    • An attachment point for hooking a lanyard ;
    • …

Maintenance :

    • A set of GO / NO-GO headspace gauges for the chamber and bore ;
    • A firing pin protrusion gauge ;
    • An extractor tension/clearance gauge ;
    • A recoil spring tester ;
    • Use of minimal tooling ;
    • If possible, no expensive, heavy, and rarely used proprietary tools ;
    • A complete armorer’s manual ;
    • An exploded-view parts manual organized by sub-assemblies ;
    • Specialized training for armorers ;
    • …

Procedures :

    • An online electronic firing logbook to track the number of rounds fired, visible at the central level to trigger scheduled maintenance and spare parts shipments to armories ;
    • Comprehensive user training ;
    • …

The Adoption Process

Drafting the technical specifications :

It was with a touch of idealism that we looked at the potential operating principles and specifications of the new firearm. These can be nuanced and combined.

First, choices among the various specifications will be dictated by selecting either a hammer-fired or a striker-fired (“axial”) system. Second, the breech-locking principle can represent another trade-off. I chose to highlight two locking systems that, in my opinion, are the most likely and most reliable for a service handgun. It should be noted that a fixed barrel allows for a very low bore axis, resulting in a more compact firearm. Once these two choices are made, the technical specifications are virtually defined.

Our initial idealism will soon hit the wall of reality :

    • Will the models submitted by manufacturers live up to our ideal ?
    • The more participants there are, the wider the selection—how many manufacturers will respond to the tender ?
    • One can imagine that a sought-after manufacturer, distributing a reliable firearm that meets the specifications, might choose not to compete for various reasons (unwillingness to restructure its industrial tooling, production volume too large, etc.) ;
    • Will all European manufacturers be motivated to participate in this contract ?
    • Which manufacturer can supply roughly 250,000 pistols, and over what timeframe ?
    • …

The testing and validation protocol is an adventure in itself :

    • How do you define tests that accurately reflect the hardships the firearm will endure during its time in service ?
    • How many rounds should be fired during testing ?
    • Which cartridge model should be adopted for testing ?
    • What accuracy test, and at what distance ?
    • How many handling, assembly, and disassembly cycles ?
    • What cleaning intervals should be applied during testing ?
    • How do you prevent legal appeals from unselected bidders ?
    • On what criteria should a firearm be rejected ?
    • Which panel of users should be selected ?
    • Which panel of armorers and specialists should be selected ?
    • Over how many weeks, and at which facility ?
    • Where will the participants be housed ?
    • Where will they be fed ?
    • …

One adventure ends, but another begins: acceptance, distribution, training, and technical oversight :

    • Defining the acceptance and validation protocol for initial deliveries—by what criteria are batches accepted or rejected ?
    • Scheduling deliveries to logistics hubs and subsequent routing down to end-users ;
    • Prioritizing initial deliveries to training academies to quickly train new personnel with no prior experience ;
    • Technical monitoring of the first deliveries, particularly in training schools where pistols see the heaviest firing ;
    • Certifying civil servants through the basic qualification certificate ;
    • Delivering initial toolkits and training unit armorers ;
    • Being prepared to address large-scale technical issues ;
    • Establishing spare parts inventories ;
    • …

When the replacement of the SIG PRO 2022 pistol is officially announced, a working group will need to be formed. This will require significant commitment and buy-in from everyone: National Police, National Gendarmerie, and other agencies.

Conclusion

The SIG PRO 2022 pistol is now a few decades old. The original manufacturer no longer produces all spare parts for this firearm. Aftermarket manufacturers have stepped in to supply certain components (springs, magazines, rear sights, front sights, etc.). In the short term, a major spare parts contract was relaunched to keep the pistol in service.

When will the SIG PRO 2022 pistol be replaced? The decision will likely come down largely to the sinews of war: state finances.

In a troubled social and security climate, this is not the time to adopt an unreliable or ill-suited firearm.

Retaining domestic know-how and an operational industrial base on national soil would avoid finding ourselves dependent on one of the few European suppliers capable of delivering hundreds of thousands of firearms. However, maintaining such an asset comes at a cost.

As one can imagine, these choices will carry heavy consequences. The future handgun will probably not be ideal, but any imperfections must be reduced to a minimum.

Over 100 years, the master plan of technical advances in the French service pistol has not been linear. Evolutions have occurred in leaps and bounds across the adoption of these five firearms. What will the future hold? What advances lie ahead? Which pistol will replace the SIG PRO 2022? Toward what aesthetic and technical heritage will we turn?

To compare technical data across comparable countries, one would need to trace and study the master plans of each of those nations. This could yield, for example, the average service life per model by country, when each nation adopted the 9×19mm cartridge, when each country adopted its first semi-automatic pistol, and so on.

In closing, I invite the reader to remember all or part of this article and await the next adoption of a semi-automatic pistol in France—allowing them to continue the analysis begun here and draw their own lessons if need be.

Posted in Handguns, Military french guns | Leave a comment

The Master Plan of Technical Advances in the French Service Pistol

In the past, I had to give an oral presentation on the SIG PRO 2022 pistol. I chose not to start the presentation directly with this firearm, but rather to cover it in a second part after introducing its predecessors. The goal was to highlight the master plan of technical advances in the French service pistol, of which the adoption of the SIG PRO 2022 is a part. At the time of writing this article, it equips the National Gendarmerie, the National Police, and Customs.

Across two articles, I am offering you an expanded transcript of this presentation.

This first article will briefly detail each of the four models leading up to the SIG PRO 2022 pistol. We will uncover a lineage connecting some of them, and we will explore the principle of heritage in product design.

In a second article, we will look at the developments introduced by the SIG PRO pistol, the qualities its replacement should possess, the replacement protocol, and then draw our conclusions. You can find this second article by following this link : The Successor to the SIG PRO 2022 Pistol.

The MAC 35A Pistol

The MAC 35A pistol is one of the first French-made service pistols adopted by France. I am excluding the Star, the Ruby, and other handguns purchased during World War I, as they were more the result of stopgap purchases driven by necessity.

Testing campaigns in the early 1920s (1921/1922) led to the adoption of this firearm in 1935. It took roughly 18 years between the start of the program and the first delivery.

For this firearm, a cartridge of the same caliber as the French pistols of the Great War (7.65 mm) but of higher power was selected. Because of this increased power, a locked-breech system was required.

A voir également : The MAC 35 A pistol.

Specifications of the MAC 35A :

    • Caliber: 7.65 mm Long ;
    • Overall length: 195 mm ;
    • Barrel length: 110 mm (4 right-hand grooves, 250 mm twist rate) ;
    • Height: 126 mm ;
    • Unloaded weight: 670 g ;
    • Magazine capacity: 8 rounds ;
    • Action: single action, removable fire control unit (FCU), locked breech, short recoil;
    • Production: approximately 85,000 units between 1937 and 1950 (approx. 6,540 per year) ;
    • Muzzle velocity: 330 to 345 m/s ;
    • Muzzle energy: 30 to 36 kgm (approx. 294 to 353 J).

The testing period and adoption of this pistol were lengthy, yet they introduced several advances. What are these notable improvements compared to previous French military pistols (Ruby, Star, etc.)? The 35A introduced a number of features that would carry forward into future designs.

The advantages of the MAC 35A :

    • A push-button magazine release ;
    • An exposed hammer ;
    • A removable fire control pack, allowing easy cleaning by the operator ;
    • A lightweight, slim, and sleek firearm ;
    • A new caliber slightly more powerful than the 7.65 Browning (.32 ACP) ;
    • More consistent manufacturing quality ;
    • High-grade steels ;
    • Interchangeable magazines ;
    • Lightweight and comfortable to carry ;
    • A locked breech, featuring two swinging links beneath the barrel ;
    • A safety lever blocking the firing pin ;
    • A removable front sight ;
    • A loaded chamber indicator ;
    • A magazine disconnect safety ;
    • A rear sight machined directly into the slide.

Conclusion on the 35A :

This pistol laid the foundations of an aesthetic and technical heritage that would reappear in the next two models. This resemblance would become even more striking (because it was more direct) in a lineage produced by the manufacturer SIG, giving rise to the Swiss Army service pistol and the magnificent P210-6 model.

During the same period, Germany adopted the P38, a 9 mm double-action pistol, while Browning introduced its Hi-Power (GP 35), a high-capacity 9 mm single-action pistol.

The MAC 35S Pistol

Photos sourced from: armoury-online.ru

The MAC 35S pistol supplemented the rollout of the firearm discussed previously. An initial batch of 1,400 pistols was delivered in 1940.

Specifications of the MAC 35S :

    • Caliber : 7.65 mm Long ;
    • Overall length : 188 mm ;
    • Barrel length : 106 mm (4 right-hand grooves, 254 mm twist rate) ;
    • Overall height : 121 mm ;
    • Unloaded weight : 720 g without magazine, 828 g with loaded magazine;
    • Magazine capacity : 8 rounds ;
    • Action: single action, removable fire control unit, locked breech, short recoil, Colt-Browning system ;
    • Production: approximately 82,753 units between May 11, 1939, and 1951 (approx. 6,365 per year) ;
    • Muzzle velocity : 330 to 345 m/s ;
    • Muzzle energy : 30 to 36 kgm (approx. 294 to 353 J).

Notable improvements over the MAC 35A :

    • A firearm simpler to manufacture ;
    • A single barrel locking link instead of two ;
    • Both front and rear sights machined directly into the slide.

Conclusion on the MAC 35S :

Its aesthetic heritage with its successor is stronger than with its predecessor, though an influence is still perceptible.

With this pistol, simplicity and ruggedness were gained while weight was reduced. The firearm remained slim compared to other handguns of the era, which is natural given its small-diameter cartridge.

The MAC 50 Pistol

This program dates back to 1946. Manufacturing began on February 27, 1951, and the first 100 units were delivered in June 1953—roughly 7 years between program launch and initial delivery.

A single glance is enough to recognize the heritage linking the MAC 50 pistol to its predecessors. Although the caliber changed, the internal architecture remained very similar.

It gradually replaced an assortment of disparate handguns, thereby standardizing the military inventory.

By choosing to manufacture the firearm in a state-owned arsenal, France demonstrated a desire for independence both in future supply chains and in manufacturing quality.

Specifications of the MAC 50 :

    • Caliber: 9 mm (9×19mm) ;
    • Overall length: 200 mm ;
    • Height: 140 mm ;
    • Thickness: 30 mm ;
    • Barrel length: 112 mm (4 left-hand grooves) ;
    • Unloaded weight: 950 g without magazine, 1,094 g with loaded magazine;
    • Magazine capacity: 9 rounds ;
    • Action: single action, removable fire control unit, locked breech, short recoil ;
    • Production: approximately 341,900 units between May 11, 1953, and 1978 (approx. 13,676 per year) ;
    • Muzzle velocity: 340 to 360 m/s ;
    • Muzzle energy: 48 to 59 kgm (approx. 470 to 578 J).

Notable improvements over the MAC 35A and 35S :

    • Caliber change, transitioning to 9 mm ;
    • Only the frame bears the serial number ;
    • Delivered in a transparent plastic box.

Conclusion on the MAC 50 :

Various links clearly connect the first three models, likely stemming from a shared culture or influence among the designers. The removable fire control pack, single-action mechanism, similar aesthetics, and use of the Colt-style locking system are all part of these shared traits.

The list of evolutions is not long, as there is no fundamental shift between the MAC 35A and the MAC 50.

The MAC 50 was criticized for the placement of its safety lever. Indeed, it was not uncommon to inadvertently engage the safety while racking the slide—a serious drawback for a service weapon. Such incidents must also have occurred with the two earlier pistols, since their safety levers were located in the exact same spot, yet no major redesign was ever undertaken to relocate it.

Still no high-capacity magazine or double-action trigger, even though 15 years earlier the GP 35 and the P38 had already paved the way.

The MAS G1 and G1S Pistols

The Beretta 92F was one of the first handguns to combine an aluminum alloy frame, a double-action/single-action (DA/SA) trigger mechanism, high magazine capacity, sleek lines, and a reasonable weight. It was designed by a reputable, well-established manufacturer that excelled in marketing and product visibility.

On July 2, 1987, the MAS G1 pistol (a clone of the 92F equipped not with a manual safety, but with a hammer decocking lever) was adopted. It competed against another icon of the era: the SIG SAUER P226. Since the Beretta design was less expensive, it was selected.

This firearm represented a first break with tradition—albeit a partial one. For the first time in a long while, the pistol’s design was not French. However, its manufacturing was: GIAT was tasked with producing and assembling the firearm. It was likely thanks to bringing in an “outside” design that France benefited from the latest advances in handgun technology. The MAB P15 might have replaced the MAC 50 had decision-makers stayed within a strictly domestic mindset.

Design heritage exists for this pistol as well. To see it, one need only look at Beretta’s history: several Beretta pistols closely or distantly resemble the Model 1934.

Specifications of the MAS G1 and G1S :

    • Caliber: 9×19mm ;
    • Overall length: 217 mm ;
    • Height: 137 mm ;
    • Thickness: 38 mm ;
    • Barrel length: 125 mm (6 right-hand grooves, 250 mm twist rate) ;
    • Unloaded weight: 960 g with empty magazine, 1,260 g with loaded magazine;
    • Magazine capacity: 15 rounds ;
    • Action: double and single action (DA/SA), locked breech with P38-style falling locking block, short recoil ;
    • Production: approximately 110,000 pistols over 7 to 8 years, or roughly 13,750 firearms per year.

Notable improvements over the MAC 50 :

    • High-capacity 15-round magazine ;
    • Dovetailed rear sight, adjustable for windage and potentially for elevation by replacement ;
    • Firing pin block safety ;
    • Squared trigger guard ;
    • Hammer decocking lever ;
    • Aluminum alloy frame (easier to machine) ;
    • Barrel, frame, and slide all serially numbered ;
    • Chrome-lined bore ;
    • Non-removable fire control mechanism (integrated into the frame) ;
    • Locking system similar to that of the Walther P38 pistol ;
    • Two-piece barrel assembly (barrel and locking block) ;
    • Double-action and single-action trigger mechanism ;
    • Supplied with a storage loader/spacer and a magazine loader ;
    • Reversible/ambidextrous magazine release.

Conclusion on the MAS G1 and G1S :

It is amusing to note that by adopting the MAS G1/G1S pistol, France broke away from French design continuity (MAC 35, MAC 50) to adopt an Italian heritage and lineage. Indeed, the MAS G1/G1S is derived from the Beretta 92, which itself echoes the lines of early Beretta pistols, notably the Model 1934.

The adoption of the MAS G1/G1S was a major leap forward. This progress came from the commercial firearms industry, which successfully combined the brand’s aesthetic heritage with :

    • A locking mechanism borrowed from the P38 ;
    • The high-capacity magazine concept (pioneered by the GP 35) ;
    • A modern, lightweight material (aluminum) ;
    • An innovative design ;
    • Modern marketing.

A French pistol could have been in the running: the MAB P15. Beretta would later adopt the MAB P15’s rotating-barrel locking principle for another Beretta model (though that is another story).

Starting in 1989, the first MAS G1 pistols were assembled using Beretta components, and subsequently with GIAT-made parts. Following issues with slide cracks and failures, the pistols were recalled to the factory for user safety. The modification consisted of replacing the hammer pin with an enlarged head, machining a groove in the slide, and machining the left grip panel. During this upgrade program, MAC 50 pistols were temporarily reissued. Once modified, the MAS G1 was redesignated as the MAS G1S. This demonstrates the importance of keeping manufacturing close at hand, or maintaining domestic infrastructure and trained personnel ready to intervene. What if it had been a Chinese or Turkish firearm ?

Conclusion

Conclusion to this first article :

This article has highlighted the concept of aesthetic and technical heritage. While this trait is celebrated in prestigious modern brands, we have no reason to be embarrassed or surprised to find it in the MAC 35 and MAC 50 pistols. The break in heritage among the firearms mentioned above was due to the adoption of a foreign pistol born from a different lineage.

Past and future articles on French service firearms neither show nor will show any flaw in manufacturing execution (as French firearms are very well built). Rather, the shortcomings lie elsewhere: in the choice of mechanisms and calibers, delays in adoption and production, an intellectual sluggishness perhaps rooted in a state-arsenal engineering culture, and a resistance to change.

It would have been interesting to attempt an evolution of the MAC 50. That could have yielded a pistol with an aluminum frame and a high-capacity magazine (much like Para-Ordnance did for the Colt .45). Adding a firing pin safety and double-action capability would have been more complex without redesigning the slide as well.

We bought from others what we could have developed ourselves. Of course, hindsight is always 20/20 once the battle is over. In this respect, we echo once again the Gunsmith Designer articles on the Chassepot rifle or the Model 1892 revolver, and the difficulty of being a visionary—or better yet, having a team of visionaries and granting them the resources to bring their vision to life. Providing skilled engineers with firearms from all over the world to broaden their knowledge and synthesize existing mechanisms is vital in a design office. The MAS G1/G1S is itself a synthesis.

The MAC 50 pistol was the last handgun designed and manufactured in France. Opening up to the MAS G1/G1S brought valuable external design insights—we became the carriers of someone else’s vision.

How does the successor to the MAS G1/G1S compare to its predecessors ? We will explore that soon in the second part of this article.

Posted in Handguns, Military french guns | Leave a comment